Defendant

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.

11 cases as defendant.

Cases
11
Active
0
11 closed
Filed
2011–2019
Top venue
D. New Jersey
5 cases
Also appears as a plaintiff in 3 cases → View as plaintiff

Company profile

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. is the U.S. subsidiary of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited, an Indian multinational pharmaceutical company founded in 1984 by Dr. Anji Reddy and headquartered in Hyderabad, Telangana, India. The U.S. entity is based at 107 College Road East, Princeton, New Jersey, and files corporate disclosure statements identifying Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. as its only parent. The parent is publicly listed on the Bombay and National Stock Exchanges and has NYSE-listed ADRs (ticker RDY); press and financial databases put it at roughly 27,500 employees and about US$3.7–3.8 billion in trailing-twelve-month revenue, with a market capitalization in the ~US$11 billion range.

Dr. Reddy's develops, manufactures and markets generic pharmaceuticals, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), biosimilars and consumer/OTC health products. Its North American generics business is the largest single contributor (about 45% of overall sales) and covers oral solid dosage forms, injectables, complex generics such as peptides, oncology products (e.g., generic lenalidomide) and biosimilars including pegfilgrastim, bevacizumab and rituximab candidates. The company has filed hundreds of ANDAs with the FDA and operates dozens of manufacturing and R&D sites worldwide.

Patent-litigation posture: Dr. Reddy's is an operating company, not an NPE. Its tracked appearances are conventional Hatch-Waxman disputes with brand manufacturers: one as defendant and one as petitioner, both arising from the same ANDA. It is a routine two-way ANDA litigant rather than a patent assertion entity, and its cases sit in the District of Delaware, not plaintiff-friendly venues such as the Eastern District of Texas.

Notable cases: Both tracked matters concern U.S. Patent 7,326,708 ("Phosphoric acid salt of a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor"), a Merck sitagliptin (Januvia/Janumet) patent. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. et al. (D. Del. 1:20-cv-00847, filed June 2020, terminated October 2021) was the infringement suit. Dr. Reddy's separately petitioned for inter partes review in Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (IPR2020-01060, filed June 11, 2020), which was instituted and joined with Mylan's IPR2020-00040.

Filing activity

2011: 1 case'11'12'13'142015: 1 case'152016: 2 cases'162017: 1 case'172018: 1 case'182019: 3 cases3'19
Cases filed per year naming Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. as defendant.

Celgene Corporation v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al.

judgment
Docket:
2:19-cv-15343
Filed:
2019-07-12
Terminated:
2022-02-23

Celgene sued Dr. Reddy's in an ANDA/Hatch-Waxman action concerning pomalidomide (POMALYST®) patents, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,198,262; 8,735,428; 8,828,427; and 9,993,467. The narrative states that US3845770 does not appear to have been asserted in this case, despite its association with the patent-page litigation listing. Final judgment was entered on February 23, 2022.

Celgene Corp. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al.

consent judgment
Docket:
2:19-cv-15343; 2:21-cv-02111
Filed:
2019-07-12
Terminated:
2022-01-28

Hatch-Waxman ANDA patent-infringement suit involving pomalidomide (ANDA No. 213234). Patents asserted included U.S. 8,198,262, 8,673,939, 8,735,428, 8,828,427, and U.S. 9,993,467. A consent judgment enjoined Dr. Reddy's from infringing the patents-in-suit until expiration and dismissed all claims, counterclaims, and defenses with prejudice.

Celgene Corp. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al.

settled
Docket:
2:18-cv-06378
Court:
D.N.J.
Filed:
2018-04-12
Terminated:
2020-09-17

Celgene sued Dr. Reddy's Laboratories over generic lenalidomide; the asserted patents included the '784 patent along with 6,315,720, 6,561,977, and 8,626,531. The case settled in 2020, with DRL licensed to sell volume-limited generic lenalidomide after March 2022 and unlimited from no earlier than January 31, 2026.

Celgene Corporation v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al.

settled
Docket:
2:16-cv-07704
Filed:
2016-10-20
Terminated:
2020-09-17

Patent infringement action involving ANDA No. 209348; complaint expressly alleged infringement of the '800, '217, '569, '498, '095, '621 and '622 patents. Settled September 17, 2020 with volume-limited license from September 1, 2022 and unlimited from January 31, 2026.

Celgene Corp. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.

settled
Filed:
2016-10-20
Terminated:
2020-09-17
Patents:7855217

Celgene sued Dr. Reddy's Laboratories in D.N.J. over generic lenalidomide, with U.S. 7,855,217 among the asserted patents. The case settled, and a consent judgment was entered on September 17, 2020, with Dr. Reddy's agreeing not to market generic Revlimid until expiration of the asserted patents. The docket number was not directly confirmed in the narrative.

Helsinn Healthcare S.A. et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al.

disposition unknown
Docket:
3:15-cv-08662
Filed:
2015-12-15
Patents:9173942

DRL's 505(b)(2) NDA No. 203050 for generic palonosetron injection led to this D.N.J. action, which the PTAB identified as the district-court assertion of U.S. Patent 9,173,942. The narrative confirms the filing and '942 assertion but could not independently confirm the final disposition.

Helsinn Healthcare S.A. et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al.

judgment (invalidated on appeal; Supreme Court affirmed)
Docket:
3:11-cv-03962
Filed:
2011-07-08

Consolidated Hatch-Waxman ANDA action in D.N.J. (lead case 3:11-cv-03962, consolidated with 3:11-cv-05579 and 3:13-cv-05815) asserting the '724, '725, '424, and '219 patents. District court found claims valid and infringed, but the Federal Circuit reversed under the on-sale bar and the Supreme Court affirmed invalidity.