Litigation

Alpha Modus Corp. v. The TJX Companies, Inc.

Active

2:25-cv-01125

Filed
2025-02-01

Patents at issue (1)

Plaintiffs (1)

Defendants (1)

Summary

Alpha Modus Corp. filed a patent infringement suit against The TJX Companies, Inc. As of May 2026, this case appears to be active.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

Case Overview and Background

This patent infringement suit is part of a large-scale, systematic enforcement campaign by Alpha Modus Corp. against major players in the retail and retail technology sectors. The plaintiff, Alpha Modus, is a publicly-traded (NASDAQ: AMOD) technology company that describes itself as a "vertical AI company" focused on in-store shopper engagement. After initially operating as a software and data-as-a-service provider, the company has pivoted its business model to focus on monetizing its extensive patent portfolio through litigation and licensing. Its CEO has publicly stated this strategic shift was due to the difficulty of competing with larger companies on commercial deployments. The defendant, The TJX Companies, Inc., is a major operating company and a leader in the off-price retail industry, running well-known store chains such as T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, and HomeGoods. TJX's business centers on a "treasure hunt" shopping experience in its thousands of brick-and-mortar stores.

The lawsuit alleges that TJX's in-store technologies infringe at least one of Alpha Modus's patents. While the specific accused systems at TJX are not detailed in publicly available documents, Alpha Modus's litigation campaign generally targets the AI and data-analytics infrastructure that retailers use to modernize the physical shopping experience. This includes systems for real-time customer behavior tracking, intelligent inventory management, digital advertising, and store layout optimization. The single patent-in-suit, U.S. Patent No. 11,301,880, generally covers systems and methods for data-driven customer assistance and personalized advertising in a retail environment. In parallel cases, Alpha Modus has accused systems like in-store computer vision, heat-mapping platforms, and retail media networks of infringement.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the case is situated in a venue long known for its experience with patent cases and rules that are often seen as favorable to plaintiffs, which may pressure defendants toward early settlements. This case is notable not as a standalone dispute but as a key data point in Alpha Modus's broader strategy to, in its own words, "standardize the market" around its technology by converting alleged infringers into licensees or "ecosystem partners." To date, Alpha Modus has filed over two dozen such lawsuits against retailers and technology providers, signaling a concerted effort to assert its intellectual property across the core technologies transforming the physical retail industry.

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

Litigation Summary and Key Developments

As of May 8, 2026, there is no public record of significant legal developments in the patent infringement litigation between Alpha Modus Corp. and The TJX Companies, Inc. The case docket (2:25-cv-01125) does not show substantive motions, claim construction orders, or a trial. This lack of public activity, when viewed in the context of the plaintiff's broader litigation campaign, strongly suggests the case was resolved and dismissed in its early stages, likely via a confidential settlement.

Alpha Modus, a subsidiary of Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMOD), initiated a widespread patent enforcement campaign in 2024-2025, filing numerous lawsuits against major retailers. This legal action against TJX appears to be one of at least 24 similar suits filed by the company.

Filing and Presumed Outcome

  • Complaint (2025-02-01): Alpha Modus Corp. filed a complaint for patent infringement against The TJX Companies, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, a venue known for being favorable to patent plaintiffs. The suit asserted U.S. Patent No. 11,301,880, which generally relates to in-store retail analytics, inventory management, and AI-driven customer engagement technologies. This patent has been asserted in numerous other Alpha Modus cases against retailers like Lowe's and H&M.

  • Likely Disposition - Early-Stage Settlement or Dismissal: While specific docket entries for a settlement or dismissal in the TJX case are not publicly available, Alpha Modus's established pattern of litigation points toward a swift, confidential resolution. The company has publicly reported reaching six early-stage settlements in its campaign. Other Alpha Modus cases have terminated rapidly:

    • A suit against Brookshire Grocery Co. was settled and dismissed with prejudice in March 2026.
    • A case against Wakefern Food Corp. was voluntarily dismissed by Alpha Modus with prejudice just 93 days after it was filed.
    • Litigation against Mood Media, LLC was jointly dismissed with prejudice after 145 days, before any substantive court rulings.

This pattern, combined with the absence of further public proceedings in the TJX matter, indicates that the most probable outcome was a settlement and dismissal sometime in 2025 or early 2026. According to press releases, Alpha Modus has framed these resolutions as a successful and "structured and disciplined approach to intellectual property enforcement."

Parallel PTAB Proceedings

A search of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) records shows no Inter Partes Review (IPR) or other post-grant proceedings have been filed against U.S. Patent No. 11,301,880. Therefore, the validity of the patent has not been challenged at the PTAB by TJX or any other defendant. The district court litigation was not impacted by any parallel administrative challenges.

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

While a definitive docket for Alpha Modus Corp. v. The TJX Companies, Inc., 2:25-cv-01125, is not publicly available through standard web searches at this time, extensive analysis of parallel patent litigation filed by Alpha Modus Corp. reveals a consistent pattern of legal representation. The law firm Prince Lobel Tye LLP has been identified as lead counsel for Alpha Modus in its nationwide patent enforcement campaign targeting retailers.

Based on appearances in numerous other Alpha Modus cases in the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, the following attorneys are the likely counsel of record for the plaintiff.

Plaintiff's Counsel

Firm: Prince Lobel Tye LLP

Based on consistent representation in Alpha Modus's litigation campaign, the following attorneys from Prince Lobel Tye LLP are expected to represent the plaintiff in this matter.

  • Name: Christopher E. Hanba
    Role: Lead Counsel
    Firm: Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Austin, TX
    Note: Hanba is a national trial lawyer who leads Prince Lobel's Austin office and serves as lead counsel for Alpha Modus in its patent enforcement campaign across the United States.

  • Name: Ariana Deskins Pellegrino
    Role: Lead Counsel
    Firm: Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Austin, TX
    Note: Pellegrino is a trial attorney specializing in patent litigation who has appeared as counsel for Alpha Modus in multiple cases and secured a $10.5 million jury verdict in a separate patent case in the Eastern District of Texas.

  • Name: Joshua G. Jones
    Role: Of Counsel
    Firm: Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Austin, TX
    Note: An experienced patent litigator, Jones has been listed as counsel on behalf of Alpha Modus entities in several patent infringement cases.

  • Name: Matthew David Vella
    Role: Local Counsel
    Firm: Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Boston, MA
    Note: In Alpha Modus, Corp. v. Adroit Worldwide Media, Inc., Vella was designated as local counsel for attorneys appearing pro hac vice. It is common practice to retain local counsel in the district where the suit is filed.

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

As of May 8, 2026, counsel for the defendant, The TJX Companies, Inc., has not yet been identified in publicly available records for the patent infringement case Alpha Modus Corp. v. The TJX Companies, Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-01125, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

A review of court records and legal news databases reveals no notices of appearance or other filings that name the attorneys representing TJX in this matter. Given that the case was filed in February 2025, it is possible that TJX has not yet formally appeared or that the relevant docket entries are not yet widely accessible through public online searches.

The plaintiff, Alpha Modus Corp., has filed numerous similar patent lawsuits against various retailers in the Eastern District of Texas. These enforcement actions allege infringement of patents related to technologies for monitoring and analyzing in-store consumer behavior.

Further analysis will be required as the case progresses to identify the specific outside and local counsel retained by The TJX Companies, Inc. for this litigation.