Litigation
AliphCom et al. v. Fitbit, Inc.
dismissed with prejudice5:15-cv-02579-HSG
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco), Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
- Filed
- 2015-06-10
- Terminated
- 2017-12-21
Patents at issue (6)
Plaintiffs (2)
Defendants (1)
Summary
Parallel district court action by AliphCom and BodyMedia against Fitbit. The court granted Jawbone's motion to stay on Dec. 30, 2015 pending the ITC proceeding, and the case was later dismissed with prejudice by stipulated order on Dec. 21, 2017. Narrative reports this action involved the same patents/issues as ITC 337-TA-963 but could not independently confirm which of the six patents appeared in the district-court complaint.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).