Litigation
Untitled case
Active2:26-cv-00235
Patents at issue (1)
Summary
An active patent litigation case filed in the Texas Eastern District Court involving patent 8810803.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Longhorn Automotive Group LLC, identified as a Non-Practicing Entity (NPE) and an entity of Alpha Alpha Intellectual Partners LLC, has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Volvo Group North America, LLC and AB Volvo, both operating companies in the automotive industry. The case, numbered 2:26-cv-00235, was initiated on March 23, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The plaintiff alleges that various Volvo vehicles infringe several of its patents, specifically citing US Patent Nos. 8,810,803; 7,987,002; 7,513,238; and 8,265,353. The accused products, services, or technologies include Volvo's headlights, driver assistance systems, and remote start technologies.
Patent 8,810,803, one of the patents at issue, is directed to a "Lens system." It describes a fragmented lens system designed to create an invisible light pattern, which is useful for computer vision systems. This system generates random or semi-random dot patterns, enabling a computer to uniquely identify each patch of a projected pattern from an illuminator or light source, thereby allowing the determination of an object's position and distance. The Eastern District of Texas is a prominent venue for patent litigation, often referred to as a "rocket docket" due to its expedited case schedules, specialized local rules for patent cases, and a reputation for being plaintiff-friendly.
This case is notable as it exemplifies the ongoing trend of NPEs asserting patent portfolios in the automotive sector, particularly within the Eastern District of Texas. Longhorn Automotive Group LLC is known as an active patent enforcer in the automotive industry, having previously sued other major car manufacturers like Nissan, Volkswagen, and Hyundai. [cite: 2, 3 (from previous turn), 4 (from previous turn)] The assertion of these patents against core vehicle technologies such as driver assistance systems and headlights underscores the potential industry impact. Furthermore, there is parallel activity at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), where challenges against Longhorn's patents, including Patent 8,810,803, have been filed, though an inter partes review (IPR) against 8,810,803 by Koito Manufacturing Co Ltd was procedurally "Not Instituted."
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
The patent infringement litigation Longhorn Automotive Group LLC v. Volvo Group North America, LLC et al., Case No. 2:26-cv-00235, was filed in the Eastern District of Texas on March 23, 2026, and is currently active. The patent at issue includes U.S. Patent No. 8,810,803.
As of the current date (May 18, 2026), given the recent filing, the case is in its very early stages. Detailed docket entries beyond the initial filing are not extensively available in public search results, and thus, many advanced litigation stages such as claim construction, discovery milestones, trial, or appeal have not yet occurred.
Here's a chronological summary of the key legal developments and current posture:
- Filing of Complaint (2026-03-23): Longhorn Automotive Group LLC filed a patent infringement complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, naming Volvo Group North America, LLC, among other potential defendants, and asserting infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,810,803 and potentially others (e.g., '238, '002, '192). The case is assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap.
No information regarding answers, counterclaims, pre-trial motions of substance (e.g., motions to dismiss, transfer, or stay), claim construction outcomes, or discovery milestones is publicly available yet, which is typical for a case filed so recently. Similarly, there have been no trial events, verdicts, post-trial motions, or final dispositions such as settlement or judgment.
Parallel PTAB IPR/PGR Proceedings:
A search for Inter Partes Review (IPR) or Post-Grant Review (PGR) proceedings specifically targeting U.S. Patent No. 8,810,803 via the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) records does not indicate any active or completed petitions against this patent as of the current date. Therefore, there are no known parallel PTAB proceedings affecting this litigation at this time.
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
As of May 18, 2026, the counsel of record representing the plaintiff(s) in the patent infringement case 2:26-cv-00235 in the Eastern District of Texas cannot be identified through public web searches.
Searches for this specific case number in the Eastern District of Texas primarily yielded results for cases in other district courts, such as the Northern District of Texas, or for different types of legal actions, like habeas corpus petitions or multidistrict litigation, none of which correspond to the described patent infringement case. Given the recent filing year (2026), it is possible that the initial filings, including the appearance of counsel, are not yet widely disseminated across public legal databases or news aggregators.
Without direct access to the court's PACER system, which would contain the most up-to-date docket information and attorney appearances, specific details regarding lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel, or in-house counsel, along with their firms, office locations, or relevant patent litigation experience, are not publicly available at this time.
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
As of May 18, 2026, public web searches for case number 2:26-cv-00235 in the Eastern District of Texas for a patent infringement matter have not yielded any specific docket information. Searches for this case number indicate related but distinct cases in other federal districts or different legal categories, such as habeas corpus petitions or civil rights complaints in the Middle District of Florida, Middle District of Pennsylvania, Southern District of Texas, and Northern District of Texas.
Due to the absence of a publicly accessible docket for the specified patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Texas, the defendant(s) have not been identified, and therefore, their counsel of record cannot be determined at this time. It is possible that the case is extremely new, has not yet been fully processed into publicly searchable databases, or is under seal.