Patent US7430471
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: RFC Lenders of Texas, LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings Overview
As of May 29, 2026, a comprehensive review of public records, including the USPTO Open Data Portal and targeted web searches, indicates that there are no AIA (America Invents Act) trial proceedings on file for US Patent US7430471. This means the patent has not been subjected to Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
Strategic Summary
Given the absence of any PTAB proceedings, all claims of US7430471 remain UNTESTED by the PTAB. There are no claims that have been formally canceled or sustained through an IPR, PGR, or CBM trial. Consequently, there is no estoppel landscape established by PTAB decisions under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) for this patent. The patent has not been subjected to any challenges before the PTAB, which is an unusual signal for a patent that has been involved in extensive district court litigation, as noted in the previously generated "Litigation summary." The absence of PTAB challenges, especially from entities like Unified Patents (which is active in the field of patent challenges), could imply various things, such as strategic decisions by potential petitioners or the perceived difficulty of challenging its claims under AIA standards.
Recommended Next Steps
Since there are no PTAB proceedings on file for US7430471, there are no ongoing trial-stage milestones to track. For a defendant facing assertion of this patent, the absence of PTAB activity means:
- All claims remain untested: No claims have been formally invalidated or affirmed by the PTAB. Any invalidity arguments would need to be litigated in district court or initiated through a new PTAB petition (if eligibility and timeliness requirements are met, though the patent's expiration on October 25, 2025, makes new petitions unlikely).
- No estoppel: Potential petitioners are not barred from raising any prior art grounds they could have raised in a previous IPR, PGR, or CBM, as no such proceedings exist for this patent.
The absence of PTAB challenges for US7430471 is a notable data point, especially considering its history of district court litigation.
Generated 5/29/2026, 9:07:59 PM