Patent 9991030
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.
Cases on file (2)
Group view →Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9991030. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
- Unified Patents v. Belden Inc.filed Jun 13, 2023IPR2023-01056Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)Final Written Decision issued
Defendants: Belden Inc.
- 1:22-cv-00783Delaware District CourtLitigation is ongoing
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
As a patent attorney, I have identified the following known litigation involving US Patent 9991030:
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Case:
- Case Number: IPR2023-01056
- Plaintiff(s): Unified Patents
- Defendant(s): Belden Inc. (patent owner)
- Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
- Filing Date: June 13, 2023
- Outcome/Current Status: Final Written Decision issued.
District Court Case:
- Case Number: 1:22-cv-00783
- Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet, but presumably Belden Inc. as the patent owner.
- Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
- Jurisdiction: Delaware District Court
- Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
- Outcome/Current Status: Litigation is ongoing.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Case:
- Case Number: 25-1428
- Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
- Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
- Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided snippet.
- Outcome/Current Status: Litigation is ongoing.
It is important to note that the provided information from Unified Patents indicates the existence of these cases, but some details like specific plaintiffs/defendants for the district court and CAFC cases, and filing dates for those cases, are not fully elaborated in the given snippets. To obtain complete details, further investigation into the specific dockets on PACER (for district court and CAFC cases) or the PTAB portal would be necessary.
Generated 6/27/2026, 6:45:31 AM