Patent 9914365
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method) on file for US Patent 9914365 as of today's date, June 2, 2026. This means the patent claims have not been challenged at the PTAB.
Strategic summary
As there are no AIA trial proceedings against US Patent 9914365, all claims (independent and dependent) remain untested by the PTAB. This implies that the patent has not undergone validity challenges based on prior art or other grounds that could be raised in an IPR, PGR, or CBM. For a defendant facing assertion of this patent, the estoppel landscape under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) is not currently applicable, as no petitioner has challenged the claims. Consequently, a defendant would not be barred from raising any ground of invalidity that they could reasonably have raised in a previous PTAB proceeding. The absence of PTAB activity also suggests that the patent has not yet been significantly targeted by potential infringers through this common validity challenge mechanism.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US9914365, a defendant facing assertion of this patent should:
- Conduct a thorough prior art search: Without the benefit of PTAB review, the validity of the claims against prior art remains unexamined. A robust prior art search is crucial to identify potential grounds for invalidity under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103.
- Consider filing an AIA trial proceeding: If strong prior art is found, initiating an Inter Partes Review (IPR) could be a viable defense strategy. This would allow for a potentially faster and less expensive resolution of validity challenges compared to district court litigation.
- Evaluate claim scope and potential infringement: Independently analyze the claims of US9914365 in light of any accused product or method to determine the strength of any infringement allegations.
Generated 6/2/2026, 6:01:17 PM