Patent 9843786

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

PTAB activity (1)

AIA trial proceedings — IPR, PGR, CBM — filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced directly from the PTAB Trial API.

  • IPR2025-01037IPRfiled May 23, 2025vs. Intel Corp. et al.Discretionary Denial

Cached for 24 hours. Status strings are sourced verbatim from the PTAB API; the colored badge is our heuristic classification.

Cases on file (7)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9843786. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

US patent 9843786 has been involved in multiple litigation cases. The current assignee, General Video LLC, is actively asserting this patent.

Here's a summary of the known litigation:

1. Inter Partes Review (PTAB)

2. District Court Cases (Patent Infringement)

General Video LLC has filed multiple infringement lawsuits in the Eastern District of Texas, asserting US9843786 along with other patents related to display technology. These cases generally target products compliant with various DisplayPort standards.

  • Plaintiff(s): General Video LLC

    • Defendant(s): Hewlett-Packard (HP)

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 5:24-cv-00123

    • Filing Date: August 30, 2024 (approximate, cases filed in late August 2024)

    • Outcome / Current Status: Concluded via Joint Stipulation and Motion of Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with prejudice. Each party agreed to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. No damages or injunctive relief were awarded. This outcome typically signals a negotiated resolution or settlement.

    • Defendant(s): Acer Inc.

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 5:24-cv-00125

    • Filing Date: August 30, 2024 (approximate, cases filed in late August 2024)

    • Outcome / Current Status: Active (as of current search data, likely ongoing).

    • Defendant(s): ASUSTek

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 5:24-cv-00126

    • Filing Date: August 30, 2024 (approximate, cases filed in late August 2024)

    • Outcome / Current Status: Active (as of current search data, likely ongoing).

    • Defendant(s): Dell

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 5:24-cv-00124

    • Filing Date: August 30, 2024 (approximate, cases filed in late August 2024)

    • Outcome / Current Status: Active (as of current search data, likely ongoing).

    • Defendant(s): Lenovo

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 5:24-cv-00122

    • Filing Date: August 30, 2024 (approximate, cases filed in late August 2024)

    • Outcome / Current Status: Active (as of current search data, likely ongoing).

Additional District Court cases mentioned in the provided patent information, but for which specific defendant details were not explicitly found in the search snippets:

  • US case filed in Texas Western District Court

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Western District Court
    • Case Number: 1:24-cv-01530
    • Filing Date: 2024 (year only from patent text)
    • Outcome / Current Status: Active (based on recent filing year).
  • US case filed in Texas Western District Court

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Western District Court
    • Case Number: 1:25-cv-02143
    • Filing Date: 2025 (year only from patent text)
    • Outcome / Current Status: Active (based on recent filing year).
  • US case filed in Delaware District Court

    • Jurisdiction: Delaware District Court
    • Case Number: 1:25-cv-01065
    • Filing Date: 2025 (year only from patent text)
    • Outcome / Current Status: Active (based on recent filing year).

Please note that for the District Court cases (excluding the HP case, which has a reported outcome), the "Outcome / Current Status" is listed as "Active" as detailed information beyond the case number and jurisdiction was not available in the provided search results to determine exact filing dates or more specific current statuses. The patent text itself lists these cases as having been "filed" in the respective jurisdictions.

Generated 5/15/2026, 6:47:30 AM