Patent 9832708
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Obviousness Analysis of US Patent 9832708 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
This analysis identifies combinations of prior art references that would render the independent claims of US Patent 9832708 (Claims 1, 11, 16, and 18) obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) as of the patent's priority date of November 4, 2008. The motivation to combine these references stems from the clear industry trends at the time towards enhancing mobile device functionality, user convenience, and the adaptive use of various communication technologies.
Key Elements of the Independent Claims:
The independent claims of US9832708 primarily describe a smartphone:
- Communicating with an "entity" using a first, short-range air interface based on a proximity criterion being satisfied, to provide information to the entity (but not to receive communication services from the entity via this interface).
- Refraining from this short-range communication when the proximity criterion is not met.
- Concurrently communicating with a base station using a second, different air interface to receive standard communication services.
- Claims 16 and 18 further specify the short-range link as point-to-point and using a Time Division Duplex (TDD) protocol, and explicitly state the entity is not involved in providing the communications service.
Combinations of Prior Art References and Motivation for Combination:
A PHOSITA, seeking to create more adaptive and context-aware mobile device experiences, would have been motivated to combine the following well-known concepts and technologies present in the prior art.
Combination 1: For Claims 1 and 11 (General Proximity-Based Mode Enablement)
A combination of US20070042738A1 (Motorola - Proximity-based mobile device content), US20040030601A1 (Pond - Electronic payment methods for a mobile device), and US20060216776A1 (Interdigital - Mobile terminal with reduced power consumption for a plurality of radio access technologies) would render Claims 1 and 11 obvious.
- US20070042738A1 (Motorola): This reference explicitly discloses a mobile device that provides content or enables various features based on its proximity to another device or a specific location. This directly anticipates the "proximity criterion having been satisfied between the smartphone and the entity" and the enabling of a mode or function responsive to this detection. The detection of proximity would inherently involve a form of short-range communication.
- US20040030601A1 (Pond): This patent application teaches electronic payment methods for mobile devices. This provides a clear motivation and a specific application for "providing information to the entity over a short-range link," such as transmitting payment details for a financial transaction (e.g., "pay toll" or purchasing an item, as discussed in US9832708). The nature of such transactions would typically be a short-range, possibly point-to-point, data exchange.
- US20060216776A1 (Interdigital): This reference describes mobile terminals configured to operate with "a plurality of radio access technologies" (i.e., multiple distinct air interfaces) and discusses managing their power consumption. This directly provides the technical foundation for a smartphone to concurrently utilize a "first air interface" (e.g., a short-range protocol for proximity-triggered payments) and a "second air interface" (e.g., a cellular standard for general communication services with a base station). The concept of distinct air interfaces for different purposes was well-established.
Motivation for Combination: A PHOSITA, aiming to enhance the convenience and efficiency of mobile device usage, especially for location-specific tasks like payments, would have been motivated to combine these teachings. It would have been obvious to integrate the concept of proximity-based function enablement (Motorola) with existing mobile payment systems (Pond). Further, knowing that mobile devices were already capable of supporting and managing multiple radio access technologies simultaneously (Interdigital), a PHOSITA would readily implement such a system where a short-range interface is used for the proximity-based interaction with an entity while a separate, cellular interface maintains general communication services. The aspect of "refraining from communicating... absent the proximity criterion" is an inherent and logical outcome of a system designed to activate only when a specific proximity condition is met. The explicit statement that the smartphone does not receive communication services from the entity via the first air interface is also obvious given that the entity (e.g., a payment terminal) is not a cellular base station.
Combination 2: For Claims 16 and 18 (Specific TDD Point-to-Point Link, Entity Not Providing Comms Service)
A combination of US20060145893A1 (Transcore - Electronic vehicle toll collection system and method), US20030220105A1 (Alcatel - Method for localizing a mobile terminal in an area under radio coverage of a cellular communication network and of a localization point), and general knowledge regarding Time Division Duplex (TDD) protocols in short-range communications would render Claims 16 and 18 obvious.
- US20060145893A1 (Transcore): This patent describes an electronic vehicle toll collection system. This directly relates to the "pay toll" example used in US9832708 and clearly implies both proximity detection (vehicle approaching a toll booth) and the exchange of information (payment data) over a short-range link between a device in the vehicle and the toll collection infrastructure.
- US20030220105A1 (Alcatel): This reference discloses a method for localizing a mobile terminal within the radio coverage of both a cellular communication network (representing the "base station using a second air interface") and a "localization point" (representing the "entity" using a "first air interface"). This teaches the simultaneous interaction of a mobile device with two distinct types of communication systems, one for general service and another for a localized, specific interaction. This also clarifies that the "localization point" (entity) is distinct from the cellular network and would not be providing general communication services.
- General Knowledge of TDD and Short-Range Links: By 2008, Time Division Duplex (TDD) was a known and implemented duplexing scheme in various wireless communication technologies (e.g., WiMAX, certain 3G/4G standards). A PHOSITA would understand TDD as a standard technique for efficient bidirectional communication over a shared frequency resource. Short-range, point-to-point wireless links were also common using technologies like Bluetooth, RFID, and other dedicated systems for local data exchange (e.g., at toll booths or point-of-sale).
Motivation for Combination: A PHOSITA working on improving electronic toll collection systems (Transcore) would naturally seek to integrate the functionality into increasingly capable mobile devices. Leveraging the ability of a mobile device to interact with local "localization points" (such as a toll booth's short-range beacon) while simultaneously maintaining its primary cellular connection (Alcatel) would be an obvious design choice for convenience and seamless operation. The decision to implement the short-range link using a "point-to-point short-range link between the smartphone and the entity using a time division duplex protocol" would be a routine engineering choice based on factors like spectrum availability, desired data rates, and efficiency for the specific short-range interaction, given the known advantages of TDD for such bidirectional communication. The explicit statement that the "entity is not involved in providing the communications service" is directly taught by Alcatel's distinction between a cellular network and a "localization point", and is implicitly understood from the nature of entities like toll booths or payment terminals.
In conclusion, the independent claims of US9832708 describe a system and method that would have been obvious to a PHOSITA by combining existing teachings related to proximity-based mobile device functionality, electronic payment systems, and the concurrent operation of multiple wireless communication interfaces.
Generated 5/22/2026, 12:48:04 AM