Patent 9817562

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

✓ Generated

As a technical patent analyst, I will now analyze the obviousness of US patent 9817562 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, considering combinations of prior art references that would render the claims obvious.

US patent 9817562, titled "Methods and apparatus for managing and exchanging information using information objects," describes a system where data items are configured into "information objects" (IOs) with a uniform card-like format. These IOs include extracted data such as a heading, source, graphical/textual material, and a hyperlink, displayed within an icon area, along with indicators and graphical access to functions.

The patent explicitly states that it is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/664,178, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/925,031, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/563,416 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,499,248). U.S. Pat. No. 8,499,248 also claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/116,747 and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/118,301 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,640,511). Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 7,640,511 claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/566,723. These earlier applications and patents, particularly US7640511B1 and US20160357874A1 (which appears to be a publication of an earlier application in the family), constitute significant prior art.

Obviousness Analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103

To determine obviousness, we consider whether the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) at the time of the invention, based on the prior art. This includes identifying a motivation to combine existing prior art references.

Key Features of US9817562:

  • Information Objects (IOs): Data items configured into distinct information objects.
  • Extraction of Data: Automatically extracting a heading, source, graphical and textual material, and a hyperlink from each data item.
  • Uniform Card Format: Displaying a representation of each IO in a uniform card format.
  • Card Components: The card includes an icon area for graphical/textual material, the heading, the source, a set of indicators, and a mechanism for graphical access to functions.
  • Dynamic Updates: IOs can continuously update to reflect changes in their information source.
  • Collaboration Features: Built-in instant messaging, commenting, voting, and sharing between users.
  • Information Views (IVs): Multiple types of views (Workspace, News, Map, Project, Graph, List) that can render IOs differently and allow exchange between them.
  • Spatial Relation Analysis: Analyzing spatial arrangements of IOs to identify relationships and suggest other relevant IOs.

Prior Art References and Their Relevance:

  1. US7640511B1 (Methods and apparatus for managing and inferring relationships from information):

    • This patent is a direct antecedent, sharing a common priority date (April 29, 2004) and inventors. It is highly likely to disclose many foundational elements of the IO concept, including the organization of information objects, the use of a graphical user interface for manipulation, and potentially the inference of relationships between information based on user interaction or arrangement. The description of US9817562 explicitly mentions that its embodiments are based "in part on the observations that conventional information collection management systems provide a significant cognitive burden on users..." and that "Embodiments of the invention incorporate advanced graphical user interfaces and functions to address the shortcomings in conventional systems. These embodiments include Information Objects (IOs) and Information Views (IVs)." This suggests US7640511B1 likely addressed some of these "shortcomings" and introduced early forms of IOs and IVs.
  2. US20160357874A1 (Methods and apparatus for managing and exchanging information using information objects):

    • This is an earlier publication of an application within the same patent family, also sharing inventors and a priority date from US7640511B1. It is highly probable that this publication details many of the core features of the IO and IV system, including their structure, the concept of standardized information format, linking to original information, and potentially the collaborative aspects. As a family member, it serves as strong evidence of what was known or obvious at its effective filing date.

Combinations of Prior Art and Obviousness Arguments:

A person having ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) in computer science and user interface design in 2004 (the priority date of the earliest related application) would have been familiar with:

  • Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and Icons: Conventional GUIs included graphical icons representing files, documents, applications, and other information objects. Users could arrange these icons spatially on desktops or within folders. [cite: The patent abstract states "A conventional graphical user interface typically includes a number of information objects such as graphical icons that represent information of relevance or importance to the user."]
  • Hyperlinking and Document Management: Systems allowed users to create and manage documents, store them in hierarchical file systems, and link to other information sources (e.g., web bookmarks). [cite: The patent states "A conventional computer system allows a user to store information referenced or created by such applications as a set of documents or files that can be retrieved by the user at a later time." and "conventional browsers store hyperlinks to web sites as bookmarks"].
  • Collaboration Tools: Basic email, instant messaging, and shared document repositories existed for collaborative work. [cite: The patent describes "conventional collaboration systems might provide a common repository for such collected information contributed by each user"].

Argument 1: US7640511B1 alone or in combination with general knowledge of GUIs and collaboration tools.

Given that US9817562 is a continuation-in-part of US7640511B1, it is highly probable that many of the core concepts, such as the idea of "information objects" (IOs) and "information views" (IVs) as a standardized format for representing and managing information, were already present in US7640511B1. The problem statement in US9817562 discusses deficiencies in conventional systems, and then states that "Embodiments of the invention incorporate advanced graphical user interfaces and functions to address the shortcomings in conventional systems. These embodiments include Information Objects (IOs) and Information Views (IVs)." This implies that US7640511B1, as a precursor, aimed to address these problems.

  • Motivation to Combine: A POSITA, understanding the limitations of conventional icon-based interfaces and disparate information formats (as described in the background of US9817562 itself), would be motivated to develop a more unified and functional information object. If US7640511B1 already introduced the foundational concept of IOs and IVs for managing information and inferring relationships, a POSITA would be motivated to further refine and enhance these objects with additional features.
  • Obvious Elements:
    • Uniform Card Format with Extracted Data: If US7640511B1 described information objects, it would be a natural design choice for a POSITA to present them in a consistent, easily digestible format like a "card," especially for comparing different types of information. The extraction of meta-data (heading, source, graphic) for display is a standard practice in information summarization and previewing (e.g., how search engines display results).
    • Icon Area, Heading, Source, Indicators, Functions: These are all logical components for an interactive information object designed to convey information efficiently and provide quick access to related actions. Icons for status indicators (e.g., active/inactive) and graphical access to functions (e.g., messaging) are common GUI design patterns.
    • Dynamic Updates: The patent states "IOs copied from the News View 305 to the Workspace View 300 may be static and not change in content, or such IOs 320 may dynamically adapt to modifications in content so that as the information source associated with an IO 320 produces new information." The concept of dynamically updating content from a source (like an RSS feed or a file system change) was known in various forms (e.g., news tickers, file synchronization). Applying this to an IO would be a straightforward extension for a POSITA seeking to make information objects more current and useful.
    • Collaboration Features (Messaging, Comments, Voting): The explicit mentioning of an "object-based communication system that allows users to communicate through IOs and IVs" and an "instant messaging system" built into the IO (bubble icon 912) suggests a deep integration of collaboration. However, the underlying concepts of instant messaging, commenting on documents, and voting mechanisms were well-established in separate applications. A POSITA seeking to enhance collaborative information management (a stated goal of US9817562) would be motivated to integrate these existing communication functionalities directly into an interactive information object. The "deficiency with conventional information processing systems is that information is represented in different formats and, depending on the format, is stored in different locations," and that "conventional information management systems do not automatically and dynamically analyze relations between user placed icons... to assist users in identifying other portions of content..." [cite: The patent describes that "conventional information processing systems... do not promote conversations and collaboration among users." and that "Another deficiency with conventional information processing systems is that information is represented in different formats and, depending on the format, is stored in different locations."]. This highlights the motivation to integrate existing communication and management features into a unified "information object."
    • Multiple Information Views (IVs): The patent describes various IVs (Workspace, News, Map, Project, Graph, List) for different contexts. The concept of presenting the same underlying data in different visualizations or views is a fundamental aspect of data management and user interface design. A POSITA would be motivated to create specialized views to enhance the utility of IOs for different tasks (e.g., a map for geographic data, a timeline for project management).

Argument 2: US20160357874A1 in combination with general knowledge of GUIs and collaboration tools.

As an earlier publication of a family member, US20160357874A1 would likely disclose many of the claimed features, if not all, making the claims of US9817562 obvious. Any differences would likely be minor refinements or elaborations that a POSITA would readily implement.

Motivation to Combine (General):

The overall motivation for combining these elements stems from the recognized deficiencies of conventional information management systems, as outlined in the background of US9817562 itself. The patent explicitly notes that "conventional information processing systems such as those noted above allow a user to organize and arrange various portions of data or other information as icons in a graphical user interface in a manner that makes sense to the user, but such systems do not promote conversations and collaboration among users." [cite: The patent states "conventional information processing systems... do not promote conversations and collaboration among users."]. Furthermore, it highlights that "information is represented in different formats and, depending on the format, is stored in different locations." [cite: The patent states that "Another deficiency with conventional information processing systems is that information is represented in different formats and, and depending on the format, is stored in different locations."].

A POSITA would be motivated to overcome these known limitations by:

  • Standardizing Information Representation: Creating a uniform "information object" or "card" to abstract away format and location details, allowing for easier comparison and management.
  • Enhancing Collaboration: Integrating communication features directly into these information objects and their views to facilitate "hosted conversations" and asynchronous collaboration.
  • Improving Information Discovery: Utilizing spatial relationships and other contextual cues to automatically suggest relevant information, addressing the "cognitive burden" on users to actively search.

Therefore, the combination of the foundational system disclosed in US7640511B1 (or US20160357874A1, which likely contains similar or more developed disclosures) with existing knowledge of GUI design principles and readily available collaboration tools would make the claimed invention of US9817562 obvious to a POSITA. The specific implementation details of the card format, the types of extracted metadata, and the particular collaborative functions, while possibly novel in their exact combination, represent predictable design choices and integrations of known elements to achieve desired functional improvements in information management and collaboration.

Generated 5/29/2026, 5:51:19 PM