Patent 9628310
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Atlas Global Technologies LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 9,628,310 as of the most recent USPTO ODP API ingest. Web search did not surface any additional or recently-filed proceedings for this patent. This gives a defendant a neutral defensive posture, as the patent has not been subjected to PTAB validity challenges.
Strategic summary
As of today, June 1, 2026, all claims of US Patent 9,628,310 remain untested by AIA trial proceedings. There are no canceled, sustained, or uninstituted claims through IPR, PGR, or CBM. Therefore, there is no estoppel landscape established under § 315(e)(2) for potential petitioners. The absence of PTAB activity suggests that either the patent has not been extensively asserted, or previous assertions did not lead to defensive PTAB challenges.
Recommended next steps
Given the absence of PTAB activity for US Patent 9,628,310, a potential defendant should consider the following:
- Conduct a thorough prior art search: Since no PTAB proceedings have challenged the patent's claims, there are no prior art grounds that have been tested and no estoppel to consider. A comprehensive search for invalidating prior art under §§ 102 and 103 would be a critical first step.
- Evaluate potential IPR/PGR filings: If strong prior art is found, a defendant could consider filing an IPR or PGR petition, depending on the patent's filing date and the type of claims. The lack of prior PTAB challenges means a new petition would not face issues of repetitive arguments or estoppel.
- Monitor for future filings: Keep an eye on the patent's status on the PTAB E2E system and Google Patents for any newly filed petitions, as well-asserted patents often attract IPRs eventually.
Generated 6/1/2026, 6:46:08 AM