Patent 9516048
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro
PTAB activity (1)
AIA trial proceedings — IPR, PGR, CBM — filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced directly from the PTAB Trial API.
- IPR2025-01437IPRfiled Sep 19, 2025vs. Google LLCDiscretionary Denial
Cached for 24 hours. Status strings are sourced verbatim from the PTAB API; the colored badge is our heuristic classification.
Cases on file (7)
Group view →Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9516048. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
- K. Mizra LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.filed Aug 9, 20212:21-cv-00305U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of TexasStatus unknown
Defendants: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
- K. Mizra LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.filed Jul 8, 20212:21-cv-00249U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of TexasStatus unknown
Defendants: Fortinet, Inc.
- K. Mizra LLC v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.filed Jul 8, 20212:21-cv-00248U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of TexasStatus unknown
Defendants: Forescout Technologies, Inc.
- Network Security Technologies, LLC v. Pulse Secure, LLCfiled Oct 24, 20171:17-cv-01490U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareStatus unknown
Defendants: Pulse Secure, LLC
- Network Security Technologies, LLC v. McAfee, Inc.filed Oct 24, 20171:17-cv-01489U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareStatus unknown
Defendants: McAfee, Inc.
- Network Security Technologies, LLC v. ForeScout Technologies, Inc.filed Oct 24, 20171:17-cv-01488U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareStatus unknown
Defendants: ForeScout Technologies, Inc.
- Network Security Technologies, LLC v. Bradford Networks, Inc.filed Oct 24, 20171:17-cv-01487U.S. District Court for the District of DelawareStatus unknown
Defendants: Bradford Networks, Inc.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Litigation and Administrative Review Involving US Patent 9,516,048
As of April 26, 2026, U.S. Patent No. 9,516,048 B2 has been the subject of multiple district court litigations and has been challenged in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The patent is currently owned by K. Mizra LLC, having been previously assigned to Network Security Technologies, LLC.
District Court Litigation
The patent has been asserted in at least seven district court cases, primarily in the District of Delaware and the Eastern District of Texas.
Plaintiff: K. Mizra LLC
Defendant: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Case Number: 2:21-cv-00305
Filing Date: August 9, 2021
Status: This case was identified in a subsequent PTAB proceeding. The specific outcome or current status requires further review of court records.Plaintiff: K. Mizra LLC
Defendant: Fortinet, Inc.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Case Number: 2:21-cv-00249
Filing Date: July 8, 2021
Status: This case was identified in subsequent PTAB proceedings. The specific outcome or current status requires further review of court records.Plaintiff: K. Mizra LLC
Defendant: Forescout Technologies, Inc.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Case Number: 2:21-cv-00248
Filing Date: July 8, 2021
Status: This case was identified in subsequent PTAB proceedings. The specific outcome or current status requires further review of court records.Plaintiff: Network Security Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Pulse Secure, LLC
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Case Number: 1:17-cv-01490
Filing Date: October 24, 2017
Status: This case was identified in a subsequent PTAB proceeding. The specific outcome or current status requires further review of court records.Plaintiff: Network Security Technologies, LLC
Defendant: McAfee, Inc.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Case Number: 1:17-cv-01489
Filing Date: October 24, 2017
Status: This case was identified in a subsequent PTAB proceeding. The specific outcome or current status requires further review of court records.Plaintiff: Network Security Technologies, LLC
Defendant: ForeScout Technologies, Inc.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Case Number: 1:17-cv-01488
Filing Date: October 24, 2017
Status: This case was identified in a subsequent PTAB proceeding. The specific outcome or current status requires further review of court records.Plaintiff: Network Security Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Bradford Networks, Inc.
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Case Number: 1:17-cv-01487
Filing Date: October 24, 2017
Status: This case was identified in a subsequent PTAB proceeding. The specific outcome or current status requires further review of court records.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Proceedings
The validity of US Patent 9,516,048 has been challenged before the PTAB in two known IPR proceedings.
Proceeding Number: IPR2025-01437
Petitioner: Information Not Available in Provided Documents
Patent Owner: K. Mizra LLC
Filing Date: Not available in provided documents.
Outcome: Not Instituted - Procedural.Proceeding Number: IPR2022-00843
Petitioner: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Patent Owner: K. Mizra LLC
Filing Date: Prior to October 31, 2022
Outcome: On October 31, 2022, the PTAB denied institution of the inter partes review.
Generated 5/13/2026, 6:46:14 PM