Patent 9510040

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9510040. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

  • 26-1705Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOpen

    Defendants: LG Electronics Inc

    Other patents asserted: 10419805, 9247174, 9055254, 9055255

    The lawsuit accuses a smart TV's on-screen user interface, which appears as a panel over a live television feed. This system provides an application for changing channels and includes an associated data service.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Here is a list of known litigation involving US patent 9510040, based on the provided patent text:

  1. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 2:23-cv-00124
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation.
  2. Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

    • Case Number: 26-1705
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation.
  3. Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

    • Case Number: IPR2024-00694
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text (though the case number implies a 2024 filing year).
    • Plaintiff(s): Petitioner not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Patent owner not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Final Written Decision.
  4. Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

    • Case Number: IPR2024-00351
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text (though the case number implies a 2024 filing year).
    • Plaintiff(s): Petitioner not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Patent owner not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Final Written Decision.
  5. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00494
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation.
  6. Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

    • Case Number: 25-2063
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation.
  7. Jurisdiction: California Central District Court

    • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00577
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation.

Generated 6/1/2026, 6:46:38 AM