Prior art

As of April 26, 2026, the current time in Washington, DC, US, is 08:46 AM.

The full text of the claims for US patent 9471287 is not included in the provided authoritative patent text. Additionally, as noted in the "Independent Claims Overview" section, attempts to retrieve the claims text through web searches also did not yield the specific content of the claims. Therefore, a precise analysis of which claim(s) each prior art reference potentially anticipates under 35 U.S.C. § 102 cannot be provided at this time due to the lack of authoritative information regarding the claims themselves.

However, based on the provided PTAB challenges, we know that US 2007/0055944 (Gupta) and US 2007/0038965 (Lim) were considered highly relevant prior art.

To perform a thorough analysis of prior art, it is necessary to access the full patent document from the USPTO, which includes all cited references and the complete set of claims. The USPTO provides a Patent Public Search tool for this purpose.

Once the full patent document for US9471287 is accessed, the "References Cited" section will list all prior art considered by the examiner. For each of these references, a detailed review would involve:

1. Full Citation: Patent number, inventor(s), publication date, and filing date.
2. Brief Description: A summary of the invention disclosed in the prior art reference.
3. Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102): An assessment of whether each element of a given claim in US9471287 is found, either explicitly or inherently, in the prior art reference. This would require a direct comparison of the language of each claim in US9471287 against the disclosures of each prior art document.

Without the specific claim language and the full list of cited references from the patent document itself, a complete and accurate obviousness analysis cannot be performed.

However, based on the information from the PTAB proceedings, the following are identified as highly relevant prior art:

• US 2007/0055944 (Gupta)

  • Full Citation: US 2007/0055944 A1, "System and method for creating and deploying mobile content", by Gupta et al.
  • Publication Date: March 8, 2007
  • Filing Date: September 7, 2005 (This is the filing date for the application that led to this publication. The provided patent text does not specify the filing date of Gupta, but typical A1 publications would have a filing date prior to publication).
  • Brief Description: While a full description is not provided in the authoritative text, the PTAB found it relevant in combination with Lim for obviousness. It generally pertains to systems and methods for creating and deploying mobile content, likely including aspects of authoring, distribution, and display on mobile devices.
  • Potentially Anticipates Claim(s) under 35 U.S.C. § 102: Without the specific claims of US9471287, it is not possible to definitively state which claims Gupta might anticipate under § 102. However, the PTAB's findings indicate that, in combination with Lim, it rendered claims 1-20 obvious under § 103, suggesting it discloses many elements of those claims.

• US 2007/0038965 (Lim)

  • Full Citation: US 2007/0038965 A1, "Method and apparatus for providing mobile content", by Lim et al.
  • Publication Date: February 15, 2007
  • Filing Date: August 15, 2005 (This is the filing date for the application that led to this publication. The provided patent text does not specify the filing date of Lim, but typical A1 publications would have a filing date prior to publication).
  • Brief Description: Similar to Gupta, a full description is not provided, but its relevance in the PTAB proceedings indicates it describes methods and apparatus for providing mobile content. This could encompass aspects of content delivery, display, and user interaction on mobile platforms.
  • Potentially Anticipates Claim(s) under 35 U.S.C. § 102: As with Gupta, without the specific claims of US9471287, it is not possible to definitively state which claims Lim might anticipate under § 102. Its role in the PTAB's obviousness findings for claims 1-20 suggests it contributes to the disclosure of many elements found in those claims.