Patent 9462410
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There is no PTAB activity on file for US patent 9462410.
Strategic summary
As of the current date, US patent 9462410 has not been subjected to any AIA trial proceedings, meaning all claims (1-20) remain untested by IPR, PGR, or CBM challenges. This implies that a potential defendant facing assertion of this patent would not be estopped from raising any prior art grounds in a new AIA trial.
The absence of PTAB challenges for a patent granted in 2016 is notable, especially if the patent has been actively asserted. This could indicate several things: the patent owner may not have been aggressively asserting the patent, or potential challengers have opted for other avenues, such as district court litigation.
Recommended next steps
If you are a defendant facing assertion of US patent 9462410, the absence of PTAB activity suggests that all prior art grounds are still available for a potential IPR, PGR, or CBM challenge. It would be advisable to conduct a thorough prior art search to identify strong grounds for invalidity that could be raised in an AIA trial.
Generated 5/22/2026, 12:45:59 AM