Patent 9317170

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9317170. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

  • Petitioner v. Power2B Inc.filed 2021
    IPR2021-01257Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)Final Written Decision

    Defendants: Power2B Inc.

  • Untitled casefiled 2020
    6:20-cv-01183Texas Western District Court

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Here is a list of known litigation involving US patent 9317170, based on information provided in the patent text and corresponding links to Unified Patents:

1. PTAB Case (Inter Partes Review)

  • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
  • Case Number: IPR2021-01257
  • Filing Date: The Google Patents entry mentions "IPR2021-01257 filed (Final Written Decision)", indicating a filing occurred in 2021. Further details on the exact filing date would require accessing the Unified Patents link for IPR2021-01257.
  • Plaintiff(s): Petitioner (details not directly available in the provided text, but identified as a "Petitioner" by Unified Patents).
  • Defendant(s): Patent Owner (Power2B Inc. as the current assignee).
  • Outcome/Current Status: Final Written Decision.

2. US District Court Case

  • Jurisdiction: Texas Western District Court
  • Case Number: 6:20-cv-01183
  • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text, but the case number 6:20-cv-01183 indicates a filing in 2020. Further details would require accessing the Unified Patents link for this case.
  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
  • Outcome/Current Status: Current status not explicitly stated in the provided text.

3. US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Case 1

  • Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Case Number: 26-1654
  • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
  • Outcome/Current Status: Current status not explicitly stated in the provided text.

4. US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Case 2

  • Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Case Number: 23-1630
  • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
  • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
  • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
  • Outcome/Current Status: Current status not explicitly stated in the provided text.

The Google Patents page also indicates "Family has litigation" and points to a Darts-ip link for "First worldwide family litigation filed", but this is a general statement about the patent family and does not provide specific US case details as requested.

Generated 6/30/2026, 12:46:46 AM