Patent 9242502

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (3)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9242502. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

  • Thales DIS France SA v. Canadian Bank Note Company Ltd et al.filed Apr 23, 2026
    6:06-cv-99999Virginia Western District CourtJudge Norman K. MoonOpen

    Defendants: Canadian Bank Note Company Ltd and CBN Secure Technologies Inc

    The products are laser-engraved driver's licenses and identification cards made of polycarbonate.

  • Thales DIS France SA v. Canadian Bank Note Company Ltd et al.filed Apr 20, 2026
    6:26-cv-00040Virginia Western District CourtJudge Norman K. MoonOpen

    Defendants: Canadian Bank Note Company Ltd and CBN Secure Technologies Inc

    The accused products are driver's licenses and identification cards made of polycarbonate material that are engraved with lasers.

  • Untitled case
    1:25-cv-01949U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginiapending

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Litigation Search Results

As of May 4, 2026, U.S. Patent 9,242,502 has been asserted in at least one known litigation case.

Case 1

  • Plaintiff(s): Thales DIS France SAS
  • Defendant(s): To be identified upon official court record review.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
  • Case Number: 1:25-cv-01949
  • Filing Date: 2025 (specific date to be confirmed)
  • Status: The current status is pending. This case was identified via the Unified Patents portal, which references a filing in the Virginia Eastern District Court. Further details regarding the specific allegations, named defendants, and subsequent docket events would require a direct review of PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) for this case number.

Generated 5/4/2026, 5:02:02 AM