Patent 9002795
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 9002795 as of the most recent ingest of USPTO Open Data Portal data. Web searches also did not surface any Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) proceedings for this patent. This indicates that the patent has not been subjected to PTAB challenges, suggesting a potentially untested defensive posture for a defendant.
Strategic summary
Based on the available information, all eight claims of US Patent 9002795 remain untested by AIA trial proceedings. No claims have been canceled or sustained through IPR, PGR, or CBM. The patent has not been narrowed by any PTAB challenges.
Since there are no PTAB proceedings, the estoppel provisions of § 315(e)(2) are not applicable to any potential petitioner. All prior-art grounds (e.g., under § 102 or § 103) that could be used to challenge the patent's validity in a PTAB trial are still available. There are no patterns of repeated challenges by specific petitioners or aggressive appeal strategies by the patent owner visible in the PTAB record.
Recommended next steps
No PTAB activity exists for US Patent 9002795. If facing an assertion of this patent, the absence of prior PTAB challenges means that a potential defendant has a full range of prior art arguments available to them should they choose to pursue an IPR. The lack of PTAB scrutiny could be seen as an opportunity, as the patent's claims have not been "hardened" by surviving such challenges.
Generated 6/16/2026, 6:01:27 PM