Patent 8976714

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (3)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8976714. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

tool_code
print(google_search.search(queries=["US patent 8976714 litigation unified patents", "US patent 8976714 litigation CAFC", "US patent 8976714 litigation PACER"]))
thought
The user is asking for known litigation involving US patent 8976714. I need to search patent litigation sites like Unified Patents, CAFC, and PACER for this specific patent number. For each case found, I need to extract the plaintiff(s), defendant(s), jurisdiction, case number, filing date, and outcome or current status. If no litigation is found, I should state that.

My previous context states "CAFC 2026 Dockets: As of April 26, 2026, no specific dockets for US patent 8976714 were found in the CAFC 2026 dockets during the performed search." This means I don't need to search CAFC again for 2026. However, I should still search generally for litigation related to this patent, as CAFC is just one court and a particular year.

I will focus my search on "US patent 8976714 litigation unified patents" and potentially broaden if needed, but Unified Patents is a good aggregate source.Known litigation involving US patent 8976714 is listed below:

Generated 5/25/2026, 6:47:08 PM