Patent 8914526

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (3)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8914526. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Litigation History of U.S. Patent 8,914,526

As of May 1, 2026, U.S. Patent 8,914,526, assigned to Portus Singapore Pte Ltd, is involved in recently filed litigation. The patent, which covers technology for remote monitoring and control of home networks via a web browser, has been asserted in multiple cases against various technology and home appliance companies.

Details of the known litigation are as follows:

1. Case Against Trane Technologies Company LLC

2. Case Against Whirlpool Corp.

  • Plaintiff(s): Portus Singapore Pte Ltd & Portus Pty Ltd
  • Defendant(s): Whirlpool Corporation
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00337
  • Filing Date: April 23, 2026
  • Status: Terminated. The case was terminated on the same day it was filed due to a "CASE OPENING ERROR by Attorney," without a judge being assigned.

3. Case Against Lennox International Inc.

It should be noted that the assignee, Portus Singapore Pte Ltd, has been involved in other intellectual property-related legal matters, including a legal malpractice lawsuit against a former law firm concerning the prosecution of the application that led to this patent. Additionally, a related case was filed by Portus against Schneider Electric USA, Inc. in the District of Delaware in 2023, though it is not specified if patent '526 was at issue in that particular case.

Generated 5/1/2026, 11:03:16 PM