Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis of US patent 8861349 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as requested because the provided patent text does not include a "Prior Art section" with specific prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, publications) that can be combined and analyzed against the claims.

The patent text lists "Prior art keywords" such as "network", "rcg", "connection", "data", and "location", and a "Prior art date" of 2002-10-15. These keywords are too general, and the date merely indicates the priority date, not specific references. A thorough obviousness analysis requires explicit prior art documents to identify combinations and motivations that would render the claims of US patent 8861349 obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art.