Patent 8784113
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8784113. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Litigation involving US patent 8784113 includes:
Case Number: IPR2022-01439
- Petitioner: Unified Patents (This entity's role is to deter Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) and protect against "frivolous patent litigation.")
- Patent Owner: Go1 Pty, Ltd. (This is inferred from the PTAB's decision that Go1 Pty, Ltd. failed to prove the claims unpatentable).
- Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
- Filing Date: The IPR case was filed on an unspecified date in 2022, but the Final Written Decision was issued at some point before May 28, 2026.
- Outcome/Current Status: The PTAB initially found that Go1 Pty, Ltd. failed to prove the challenged claims unpatentable. However, the Federal Circuit vacated this decision on May 28, 2026, finding that the Board's conclusion regarding conclusory expert testimony on step sequencing was not supported by substantial evidence.
Case Number: 3:21-cv-01258
- Plaintiff(s): OPENSESAME, Inc.
- Defendant(s): GO1 Pty, Ltd.
- Jurisdiction: Oregon District Court
- Filing Date: 2021
- Outcome/Current Status: An "Opinion and Order on Claim Construction" was issued on May 5, 2026.
Case Number: 24-1762
- Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Outcome/Current Status: This case is active, as noted in the patent's information, and relates to the appeal of the PTAB decision in IPR2022-01439.
It is important to note that the Federal Circuit exclusively hears appeals in patent infringement cases.
Generated 5/29/2026, 6:01:16 AM