Patent 8721511

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8721511. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

  • Untitled case
    7:25-cv-07699New York Southern District CourtCritical

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

As a patent attorney, I have conducted a search for known litigation involving US Patent 8,721,511.

Here is the information I found:

Known Litigation Involving US Patent 8,721,511:

  • Case: 7:25-cv-07699

    • Jurisdiction: New York Southern District Court
    • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided information for this specific case.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Critical (meaning it's an important case, but the current status is not detailed).

  • Case: 1:25-cv-07699

    • Jurisdiction: New York Southern District Court
    • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided information for this specific case.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not detailed.

  • Case: 337-TA-3767

    • Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission
    • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided information for this specific case.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not detailed.

  • Case: 337-TA-1419

    • Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission
    • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided information for this specific case.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not detailed.

Please note that while some litigation cases are listed, specific details like plaintiffs, defendants, and precise filing dates for each case were not fully available in the provided search snippets. The "Critical" status for one case suggests ongoing or significant litigation, but further investigation into individual dockets would be necessary for a comprehensive understanding of each case's specifics and outcome.

Generated 5/29/2026, 5:57:04 PM