Patent 8713624
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: ContentNexus LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
As of 2026-05-31, the USPTO Open Data Portal API indicates no AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method) have been filed against US patent 8713624.
A search of public PTAB records indicates that there are no AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method) on file for US Patent 8,713,624. This means the patent's claims have not been challenged in an AIA trial before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Strategic summary
All claims of US8713624 remain untested by AIA trial proceedings before the PTAB. There are no canceled, sustained, or pending claims resulting from IPR, PGR, or CBM trials. This means that a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have all statutory grounds for challenging the patent's validity via an IPR or PGR still available. The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent has not yet been subjected to rigorous third-party validity challenges in this forum.
Recommended next steps
Given the absence of PTAB activity, a potential defendant should consider conducting a thorough prior art search to assess the validity of US8713624's claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. If strong prior art is identified, filing an Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition could be a viable strategy to challenge the patent's claims. The lack of previous PTAB challenges means there is no estoppel against raising any prior art grounds.
Generated 5/31/2026, 6:48:37 AM