Patent 8646001
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.
Cases on file (1)
Group view →Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8646001. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
- ContentNexus LLC v. Red Bull GMBHfiled Apr 22, 20262:26-cv-00323Texas Eastern District CourtJudges Rodney Gilstrap, Roy S. PayneOpen
Defendants: Red Bull GMBH
Other patents asserted: 10523350, 7818777, RE47968, 7793332, 8839293
The accused products are signal processing devices and the methods they use.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Known litigation involving US patent 8646001 includes:
- Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
- Case Number: 2:26-cv-00323
- Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in the available patent text or search results.
- Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in the available patent text or search results.
- Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in the available patent text or search results.
- Outcome or Current Status: The case is noted as "US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court," but further details regarding its outcome or current status are not provided in the available information.
The Google Patents page for US8646001 also indicates that "Family has litigation" and points to a "First worldwide family litigation filed" via a Darts-ip link, but specific case details beyond this general statement are not directly accessible from the provided information.
Generated 5/30/2026, 6:45:49 AM