Patent 8514815
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.
Cases on file (2)
Group view →Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8514815. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
- Freedom Patents LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al.filed Jun 14, 20244:24-cv-00537Eastern District of Texasterminated Aug 27, 2024Dismissed with prejudice (settled)
Defendants: LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc.
- Freedom Patents, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.filed Jun 14, 2024Eastern District of Texasterminated Aug 23, 2024Dismissed with prejudice
Defendants: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Harman International Industries, Inc.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
As of April 26, 2026, US Patent 8514815 has been involved in litigation.
Known Litigation for US Patent 8514815:
- Plaintiff(s): Freedom Patents, LLC
- Defendant(s): [[Samsung Electronics Co.](/litigations/by-defendant/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.), Ltd.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.), [Samsung Electronics America, Inc.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20America%2C%20Inc.), and Harman International Industries, Inc.
- Jurisdiction: Eastern District of Texas
- Case Number: Not explicitly provided in the snippets, but multiple case numbers are listed under "Family has litigation" on the Google Patents page, all in the Eastern District of Texas, e.g., 4:23-cv-00422, 4:24-cv-00534, etc.
- Filing Date: June 14, 2024
- Outcome/Current Status: Dismissed with prejudice on August 23, 2024, by Chief Judge Amos L. Mazzant. The dismissal with prejudice means Freedom Patents cannot refile the same claims against Samsung on these patents. Each party was ordered to bear its own attorney fees, costs, and expenses.
Generated 5/29/2026, 8:59:58 PM