Patent 8365799
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: NSV Group Fzco
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
As of May 30, 2026, no AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method) for US patent 8365799 are on file with the USPTO Open Data Portal, and none were found through web searches. This indicates that the patent has not been subjected to PTAB challenges, which may suggest a potentially unhardened patent from a PTAB perspective, or simply that its claims have not yet drawn such challenges.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US patent 8365799 are UNTESTED by any AIA trial proceeding. This means there is no PTAB-generated estoppel landscape, as no challenges have been made. For a potential defendant, all prior-art grounds (including those under § 102 and § 103) remain available for a potential future PTAB petition, without any preclusive effects from previous proceedings. The absence of PTAB activity could imply that the patent has not been widely asserted in litigation that would typically prompt IPR filings, or that its claims are perceived as robust enough to deter such challenges.
Recommended next steps
If facing assertion of US patent 8365799, the absence of PTAB activity suggests that a defendant would have a "clean slate" to file a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) against the patent, assuming statutory deadlines and other requirements are met. There are no prior PTAB decisions to consider for claim validity or estoppel. The lack of prior challenges also means there are no existing panel decisions or reasoning to leverage, making the initial analysis of patentability grounds critical.
Generated 5/30/2026, 6:46:24 PM