Patent 8103865

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: GOTV Streaming, LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There is one AIA trial proceeding on file for US Patent 8,103,865. This proceeding is currently active. While specific claim-level outcomes are not yet available, the existence of an active IPR indicates that the patent's validity is currently being challenged.

IPR2023-00759 — Unified Patents v. Gotv Streaming LLC

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: The precise filing date is not available in the provided text, but the PTAB case was filed in 2023.
  • Status: Active. The case is listed as "Final Written Decision" in the Google Patents litigation section, which typically indicates a decision has been issued. However, further details on the outcome are not immediately present within the provided information.
  • Judge panel: Not publicly available in the provided information.
  • Petition grounds: Not publicly available in the provided information. IPRs generally challenge patentability under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 (novelty) and/or 103 (obviousness) based on patents and printed publications.
  • Institution decision: Not publicly available in the provided information.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): The Google Patents page indicates "Final Written Decision" for IPR2023-00759. To ascertain the specific verdict at a claim-level granularity and the panel's reasoning, further investigation into the USPTO PTAB Decisions database or CourtListener would be required.
  • Settlement / termination: Not publicly available in the provided information.
  • Appeal: The Google Patents page indicates "US case filed in Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" for two related cases: 24-1744 and 24-1669. These likely represent appeals stemming from the Final Written Decision in IPR2023-00759 or related district court litigation.
  • Defensive value: As an active or recently decided IPR with potential appeals, the validity of at least some claims of US8103865 is currently under scrutiny. A defendant facing assertion should investigate the FWD to determine which claims, if any, were invalidated. If claims relevant to the defendant's product or service were invalidated, this could significantly weaken the patent owner's position. Conversely, if the claims were upheld, it may suggest a hardened patent.

Strategic summary

The key development for US8103865 is the active (or recently concluded) Inter Partes Review, IPR2023-00759, initiated by Unified Patents against Gotv Streaming LLC. While the precise outcome of the Final Written Decision at a claim-by-claim level is not detailed in the provided data, the mention of "Final Written Decision" suggests a resolution at the PTAB. Crucially, there are also records of appeals filed in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (cases 24-1744 and 24-1669), which likely pertain to the outcome of this IPR or related district court actions. This signifies that the patent's validity has been, or is still being, thoroughly vetted through post-grant proceedings and subsequent appeals.

The involvement of Unified Patents as a petitioner often signals a strategic challenge to patents that are perceived as being asserted aggressively or being used by non-practicing entities. This indicates a concerted effort to test the validity of US8103865. Until the specific claims invalidated or sustained by the FWD and any subsequent Federal Circuit decisions are known, the exact impact on the patent's scope remains uncertain. However, the litigation records suggest that the patent owner is actively defending the patent through the appellate process.

Recommended next steps

A defendant facing assertion of US8103865 should immediately obtain and review the Final Written Decision for IPR2023-00759 to understand the specific outcome regarding the patent claims. The USPTO PTAB Decisions database is the authoritative source for these documents. If the FWD has invalidated claims that are being asserted, this provides a strong defense. Given the reported appeals to the Federal Circuit (cases 24-1744, 24-1669), monitoring those dockets for their disposition is also crucial. The outcome of these appeals will definitively establish the patentability of the challenged claims.

Generated 6/30/2026, 6:45:34 AM