Patent 7793332
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: ContentNexus LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no publicly recorded AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method) on file for U.S. Patent No. 7,793,332 as of May 30, 2026. This means the patent has not been subjected to PTAB challenges, and all its claims remain untested in this forum, offering no specific defensive posture from prior PTAB outcomes.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,793,332 remain untested in AIA trial proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. There is no public record of any IPR, PGR, or CBM trials having been filed against this patent. Consequently, there are no claims that have been canceled or sustained by a PTAB Final Written Decision, and no estoppel has been established under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2).
The absence of PTAB activity suggests a few possibilities: either the patent has not been extensively asserted, potential petitioners have not identified strong prior art grounds for challenge under the PTAB standards, or any challenges have been settled before institution or a final decision, without public record. The patent's priority date of November 3, 1981, and its filing date of June 7, 1995, indicate it is a relatively older patent in the context of AIA trials (which became available for patents filed on or after March 16, 2013, or patents that issue from applications subject to a first-to-file system). However, given its issue date of September 7, 2010, it would be eligible for IPR.
Recommended next steps
If you are a defendant facing assertion of U.S. Patent No. 7,793,332, the absence of PTAB proceedings means that an IPR, PGR, or CBM challenge is a potential avenue to explore. There are no prior PTAB decisions to consider regarding claim cancellation or patentability. Therefore, a thorough prior art search and an assessment of potential invalidity grounds under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 (and potentially § 112, depending on the claims) would be the critical first step to evaluate the viability of filing a petition.
Generated 5/30/2026, 6:48:42 AM