Patent 7770122

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7770122. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Known litigation involving US patent 7,770,122 includes the following cases, as indicated by information within the patent document itself:

  • Plaintiff(s): Likely Diem LLC (current assignee and known asserter of the patent)

  • Defendant(s): Not specified in the provided text.

  • Jurisdiction: California Northern District Court

  • Case Number: 3:18-cv-05978

  • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided text.

  • Outcome/Current Status: Not specified in the provided text.

  • Source:

  • Plaintiff(s): Likely Diem LLC (current assignee and known asserter of the patent)

  • Defendant(s): Not specified in the provided text.

  • Jurisdiction: Texas Western District Court

  • Case Number: 1:18-cv-00515

  • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided text.

  • Outcome/Current Status: Not specified in the provided text.

  • Source:

  • Plaintiff(s): Likely Diem LLC (current assignee and known asserter of the patent), confirmed as plaintiff in DIEM LLC v. BIGCOMMERCE INC (Eastern District of Texas, 2017) in previous analysis.

  • Defendant(s): BigCommerce Inc. (based on previous analysis).

  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

  • Case Number: 6:17-cv-00186

  • Filing Date: 2017 (as indicated by the case number and prior analysis of pre-litigation transfer).

  • Outcome/Current Status: Not specified in the provided text.

  • Source:

  • Plaintiff(s): Likely Diem LLC (current assignee and known asserter of the patent)

  • Defendant(s): Not specified in the provided text.

  • Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

  • Case Number: 19-1745

  • Filing Date: Not specified in the provided text.

  • Outcome/Current Status: Not specified in the provided text.

  • Source:

The Google Patents page also indicates "First worldwide family litigation filed" with a link to Darts-ip, but specific details for this entry are not available in the provided text.

Generated 5/29/2026, 8:49:19 PM