Patent 7670612

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7670612. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Known Litigation Involving US Patent 7,670,612

As of May 1, 2026, there is one known litigation involving the patent owner, INNERCAP Technologies, Inc., where the patent-in-suit has not yet been publicly identified, and one inter partes review (IPR) proceeding involving a closely related patent.

District Court Litigation

INNERCAP Technologies, Inc. v. Walmart Inc.

  • Plaintiff(s): INNERCAP Technologies, Inc.
  • Defendant(s): Walmart Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
  • Case Number: 1:26-cv-00488
  • Filing Date: April 27, 2026
  • Outcome or Current Status: This case is newly filed and is currently open. The specific patents asserted by INNERCAP Technologies, Inc. in the complaint have not yet been made publicly available in the initial case filings. Therefore, it is not confirmed at this time whether US patent 7,670,612 is involved in this litigation.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Proceedings

While there is no record of direct litigation involving US patent 7,670,612, a closely related patent, US 8,361,497, which is a continuation of the '612 patent, was the subject of an inter partes review (IPR).

Capsugel Belgium NV v. Innercap Technologies, Inc.

  • Petitioner: Capsugel Belgium NV
  • Patent Owner: Innercap Technologies, Inc.
  • Jurisdiction: U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
  • Case Number: IPR2013-00331
  • Filing Date: June 6, 2013
  • Outcome or Current Status: An adverse judgment was entered against the patent owner, Innercap Technologies, Inc., resulting in the cancellation of all challenged claims of the patent-in-suit. It is important to note that the patent challenged in this IPR was U.S. Patent No. 8,361,497, not U.S. Patent No. 7,670,612. However, given that the '497 patent is a continuation of the '612 patent, the arguments and prior art used in this proceeding could be highly relevant to the validity of the claims in US 7,670,612.

At present, no other litigation specifically naming US patent 7,670,612 has been identified in publicly available records.

Generated 5/1/2026, 12:31:26 AM