Patent 7610277
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Excalibur IP, LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings for US patent 7,610,277 on file as of the most recent ingest by the USPTO Open Data Portal. A web search for PTAB proceedings related to this patent also did not yield any specific results. This indicates that there has been no PTAB activity on this patent. This gives a defendant a neutral defensive posture regarding PTAB, as the patent has neither been challenged nor strengthened through these proceedings.
Strategic summary
As there are no PTAB proceedings on file for US patent 7,610,277, all claims (Claims 1-25) remain untested by the PTAB. There are no claims canceled or sustained by PTAB decisions. Consequently, the estoppel landscape under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) is not applicable, as no final written decisions have been issued. For a defendant facing assertion of this patent, all prior-art grounds remain available for challenge, either in district court or through a future PTAB petition, assuming statutory and time requirements are met. The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent has not yet been subject to inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), or covered business method (CBM) proceedings.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US patent 7,610,277, a potential defendant has several options, including initiating an IPR, PGR, or CBM proceeding if they believe valid grounds exist and meet the statutory requirements. The absence of prior PTAB challenges means there's no existing estoppel to contend with from previous PTAB decisions. However, it also means there's no pre-established invalidity finding to leverage. The PTAB provides public access to decisions and tools to search for proceedings.
Generated 5/29/2026, 8:51:36 PM