Patent 7398723
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Rare Breed Triggers Inc, ABC IP LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for U.S. Patent 7,398,723, according to both the USPTO Open Data Portal API and conducted web searches. This means the patent has not been subjected to IPR, PGR, or CBM challenges, and all claims (Claim 1) remain untested by the PTAB. This gives a defendant less clarity regarding the patent's robustness against prior art challenges in an administrative setting, but also means no claims have been invalidated or narrowed through PTAB trials.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of U.S. Patent 7,398,723 remain untested and therefore sustained, as no PTAB proceedings have been found. The patent contains a single independent claim (Claim 1), which has not been challenged in an AIA trial. Consequently, there is no estoppel landscape to consider under § 315(e)(2), as no grounds were raised or could have been raised in an IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent owner has not yet faced a direct challenge to the patentability of the claims before the Board.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for U.S. Patent 7,398,723, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would need to initiate a new AIA trial if they wish to challenge its validity before the PTAB. The absence of prior PTAB challenges means there is no existing record of the patent owner defending the claims against prior art in an IPR/PGR/CBM context.
Generated 6/1/2026, 12:47:59 PM