Patent 6993658

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6993658. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

US patent 6993658 has been involved in multiple litigation cases. Here is a summary of the known cases:

  • Case 1: Dynapass IP Holdings LLC v. Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    • Plaintiff(s): Dynapass IP Holdings LLC
    • Defendant(s): Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    • Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00217
    • Filing Date: June 17, 2022
    • Outcome/Current Status: Dismissed with prejudice on January 18, 2024. This means Dynapass cannot refile the same claims against Wells Fargo. Each party bore its own costs. The case was a member case within broader consolidated proceedings, with broader consolidated proceedings remaining live.

  • Case 2: Dynapass IP Holdings, LLC v. Simmons First National Corporation and Simmons Bank

    • Plaintiff(s): Dynapass IP Holdings, LLC
    • Defendant(s): Simmons First National Corporation and Simmons Bank
    • Jurisdiction: Eastern District of Texas
    • Case Number: 2:23-cv-00068
    • Filing Date: February 20, 2023
    • Outcome/Current Status: Dismissed with prejudice on May 30, 2024. Dynapass's claims against Simmons were dismissed with prejudice, while Simmons' counterclaims were preserved without prejudice. Each party bore its own costs. This case was also a member case in a coordinated docket, with lead case 2:23-cv-00063-JRG-RSP remaining open.

  • Case 3: Dynapass IP Holdings, LLC v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., PNC Bank, N.A., BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc., and BBVA USA

    • Plaintiff(s): Dynapass IP Holdings, LLC
    • Defendant(s): PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., PNC Bank, N.A., BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc., and BBVA USA
    • Jurisdiction: Eastern District of Texas
    • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00214
    • Filing Date: June 17, 2022
    • Outcome/Current Status: Concluded through a Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice on July 24, 2024. All claims and causes of action were dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs.

Additionally, the patent has been the subject of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.

  • On July 18, 2023, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted trial on all challenged claims in an IPR filed by Unified against US patent 6993658. The patent has been asserted against several banks including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Truist, and PNC, and was recently asserted against Amazon and Experian.

Generated 6/11/2026, 6:00:55 PM