Patent 5852810
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5852810. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
As a patent attorney, I have investigated known litigation involving US Patent 5852810.
A search for litigation directly involving US Patent 5852810 across various databases, including Unified Patents and PACER, did not yield any specific case results for this patent number.
It is important to note that while PACER is a valuable resource for federal court records, a recent class-action lawsuit alleged that the U.S. government unlawfully overcharged users for PACER fees between April 21, 2010, and May 31, 2018. This class action, National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. v. United States, Case No. 1:16-CV-00745-PLF, in the District Court for the District of Columbia, resulted in a $125 million settlement, with final approval granted on March 20, 2024. An appeal of this final approval was filed on April 17, 2024, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which heard oral argument on January 7, 2026. This PACER litigation is a general issue with the system and not specific to US Patent 5852810.
Based on the available information, there is no known litigation specifically involving US Patent 5852810.
Generated 5/16/2026, 12:45:47 AM