Patent 12578159
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Rare Breed Triggers Inc, ABC IP LLC
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
As of May 31, 2026, there are no AIA trial proceedings on file for U.S. Patent 12,578,159 in the USPTO Open Data Portal. Web search also did not reveal any active or concluded PTAB proceedings for this patent. This suggests that the patent has not yet been challenged through Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) review. The bottom-line defensive posture for a defendant is that all claims of the patent are currently untested by the PTAB.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US Patent 12,578,159 are untested by the PTAB. This means there are no canceled or sustained claims from PTAB proceedings, and the entire scope of the patent remains available for assertion by the patent owner, ABC IP LLC.
Without any PTAB proceedings, there is no estoppel landscape established under § 315(e)(2). Therefore, any defendant facing assertion of this patent would theoretically be free to raise any valid prior art grounds in a new IPR or PGR petition, provided they meet the statutory requirements and deadlines. The absence of PTAB activity could be a signal that the patent is relatively new, or perhaps that potential petitioners are still evaluating their strategies or choosing to challenge related patents in the family first.
Recommended next steps
If you are a defendant facing assertion of US Patent 12,578,159, and given the absence of any PTAB activity to date, it would be advisable to:
- Conduct a thorough prior art search: Identify potential prior art references that could be used to challenge the patentability of the asserted claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103.
- Evaluate filing an IPR petition: If strong prior art is found, consider filing an IPR petition to challenge the patentability of the claims. This would be a proactive measure to potentially invalidate the patent or narrow its scope. The one-year deadline for filing an IPR from service of a complaint should be carefully monitored.
- Monitor related patent families: Keep an eye on any PTAB activity concerning related patents owned by ABC IP LLC, especially those concerning similar forced-reset trigger technology. Outcomes in those cases could provide valuable insights and potentially influence strategy for US12578159.
Generated 5/31/2026, 12:47:32 AM