Patent 12529538

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (4)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 12529538. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Known litigation involving US patent 12529538 as of April 26, 2026, includes several cases filed in U.S. District Courts. The details regarding the plaintiff(s), defendant(s), filing date, and current status are primarily available through specialized legal databases like Unified Patents or Darts-ip, which were not directly accessible for granular data extraction via public web searches.

Based on the available information, the following litigation cases are known:

  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00055
    • Plaintiff(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Defendant(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Filing Date: Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Not publicly available from current search results.
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00033
    • Plaintiff(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Defendant(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Filing Date: Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Not publicly available from current search results.
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 4:26-cv-00378
    • Plaintiff(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Defendant(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Filing Date: Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Not publicly available from current search results.
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00054
    • Plaintiff(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Defendant(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Filing Date: Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Not publicly available from current search results.
  • Jurisdiction: Illinois Northern District Court

    • Case Number: 1:26-cv-01072
    • Plaintiff(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Defendant(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Filing Date: Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Not publicly available from current search results.
  • Jurisdiction: Tennessee Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 1:25-cv-00389
    • Plaintiff(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Defendant(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Filing Date: Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Not publicly available from current search results.
  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00030
    • Plaintiff(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Defendant(s): Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Filing Date: Not publicly available from current search results.
    • Outcome/Current Status: Not publicly available from current search results.

These cases are indicated as being tracked by "Unified Patents Litigation Data." To obtain specific details such as the plaintiff(s), defendant(s), exact filing dates, and current status of these cases, direct access to the Unified Patents portal or a similar subscription-based legal database would be required.

Generated 5/31/2026, 12:46:59 PM