Patent 12337716

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

✓ Generated

To conduct a thorough analysis of the obviousness of US Patent 12,337,716, access to the full text of the patent, including its claims, and the content of the prior art references cited during its examination is necessary. The provided search results do not contain the specific prior art references cited against this patent. Therefore, a comprehensive obviousness analysis cannot be performed at this time.

To proceed, the following information is required:

  • The full list of prior art references cited during the prosecution of US Patent 12,337,716. This information is typically found in the "References Cited" or "Prior Art" section of the patent document or in the file wrapper available through the USPTO's Patent Center.
  • The full text of each of the cited prior art references.

Once these documents are available, a detailed analysis can be conducted by:

  1. Analyzing the Claims of US Patent 12,337,716: Each independent claim will be broken down into its essential elements.
  2. Reviewing the Prior Art: Each cited reference will be reviewed to identify the technologies and functionalities it discloses.
  3. Mapping Prior Art to Claims: The disclosures of the prior art references will be compared to the elements of the claims of the '716 patent to determine which elements are taught by the prior art.
  4. Formulating Obviousness Combinations: Combinations of prior art references will be identified that, when viewed together, would have made the claimed invention obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made.
  5. Articulating the Motivation to Combine: For each combination, a clear and well-reasoned explanation will be provided as to why a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine the teachings of the references to arrive at the claimed invention. This will involve considering the problems addressed by the prior art, the solutions they propose, and any suggestions or teachings within the references themselves that would lead to their combination.

Without the specific prior art references, any analysis would be speculative and not grounded in the actual prosecution history of the patent.

Generated 5/13/2026, 12:19:59 AM