Patent 12236728
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The obviousness of US patent 12236728 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 can be assessed by considering combinations of prior art references that would have motivated a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) to arrive at the claimed invention by the priority date of December 15, 2010. The patent's own "BACKGROUND" section and "Definitions" provide insights into the relevant prior art and the problem the invention aimed to solve.
The core of US12236728, as described in its abstract and summary, is a mobile telecommunications device (e.g., a smartphone) configured to log driving information associated with a vehicle. This device includes a sensor set (image sensor, audio sensor, accelerometer, positioning module), a processor, and memory. Crucially, it's configured to determine the start of a driving period based on user interface inputs and sensor data from its own sensor set, without data from sensors of the vehicle, process this data to derive driving information, and store it.
Combination of Prior Art References
The following combination of known prior art elements would have rendered the claims of US12236728 obvious to a PHOSITA:
1. Acknowledged Prior Art: Dedicated Vehicle Data Logging Devices (Black Boxes)
The patent explicitly states that "Data logging devices are commonly installed on aircraft that log data about events associated with the behaviour of the aircraft and also the crew controlling the aircraft. Such data logging devices are commonly termed 'black boxes' and are very useful for determining the cause of problems... Similar data logging devices exist for road vehicles." These devices were known to either integrate with a vehicle's data network or have their "own internal sensor set." However, the patent identifies a key problem: these devices for road vehicles were "less prevalent perhaps due to their unjustifiable expense" and had "minimal" uptake, particularly for retrofitting.
2. Ubiquitous Technology: Mobile Telecommunications Devices (Smartphones) with Integrated Sensors and Processors
By the priority date of December 15, 2010, smartphones (such as the iPhone 4, mentioned in the manual, or various Android devices) were widely available and becoming increasingly sophisticated. The patent itself notes, "Mobile telecommunication devices such as 'smart-phones' are becoming increasingly widespread, and these devices tend to have the requisite sensor sets to capture data concerning vehicle behaviour." These devices commonly included:
- Image sensors (cameras): For capturing still images and video.
- Audio sensors (microphones): For recording audio.
- Accelerometers: For detecting motion, orientation, and g-forces.
- Positioning modules (GPS receivers): For determining location and velocity.
- Processors, memory, and user interfaces: Standard components for executing applications and storing data.
3. Established Software Distribution: Downloadable Applications (Apps)
The concept of downloadable software applications (apps) to extend the functionality of mobile devices was well-established. The patent refers to the application being "sourced from an application store and/or content provider" such as the "Apple® Appstore®." This demonstrated a known method for distributing software to mobile devices.
4. Common Accessories: Vehicle Mounts/Adapters for Mobile Devices
To address the concern that generic mobile devices are "not best placed to generate sensor data associated with the behaviour of a vehicle", the patent proposes that "the mobile telecommunication device may comprise an adapter arranged to hold the device securely to the vehicle." By 2010, car mounts and adapters for smartphones were common accessories, used for purposes such as navigation, hands-free communication, or displaying music players.
Motivation for Combination
The clear motivation for a PHOSITA to combine these known elements arises directly from the problem identified in the patent's background: the high "expense" and "minimal uptake" of dedicated vehicle data logging devices.
A PHOSITA, aiming to "alleviate the above-mentioned problems" and provide an "inexpensive" and "conveniently and inexpensively retrofitted" solution, would have been highly motivated to leverage the widespread and affordable technology of smartphones. The patent explicitly states this motivation: "a generic mobile telecommunication device already owned by a driver of the vehicle can be loaded with the application to provide such data logging functionality that would otherwise necessitate a dedicated black-box." This highlights the economic incentive to use existing consumer hardware.
The particular feature of "determining... a start of a driving period... without data from sensors of the vehicle" would also be obvious. Given the cost and difficulty associated with integrating data loggers with a vehicle's internal data network, a PHOSITA seeking a low-cost, retrofittable solution would naturally turn to the independent sensing capabilities of a smartphone. Using the smartphone's internal GPS to detect speed, its accelerometer to detect motion, or its camera for visual cues (e.g., detecting movement through the windshield) to infer the start of a driving period would be a logical and straightforward application of these readily available internal sensors.
Furthermore, the patent's acknowledgment that the use of a generic mobile device might seem "counter-intuitive" due to its lack of robustness or ideal sensor placement does not negate obviousness. Instead, it frames a problem for which the solution—securing the device in the vehicle with an adapter and developing software to interpret its sensor data—would be an obvious engineering challenge to overcome for a PHOSITA aiming to adapt consumer technology for this purpose.
In summary, by 2010, the functionality of dedicated vehicle data recorders, the sensor capabilities of widely available smartphones, the ease of distributing software via app stores, and the existence of car mounts were all well-known. A PHOSITA, motivated by the stated problem of expensive and underutilized dedicated logging devices, would have found it obvious to combine a smartphone (with its internal sensors, processor, and memory) with a downloadable application and a vehicle mount to create an inexpensive, retrofittable system for logging vehicle behavior, utilizing the device's own sensors to determine driving periods and derive driving information.
Generated 6/15/2026, 12:49:37 AM