Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis of US Patent 12230394 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as requested.

The provided patent text includes a "Prior art keywords" section (listing "mobile device", "data", "barcode", "user", "information"), but it does not list specific prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, academic papers, or other publications) that can be combined for an obviousness argument. Without specific prior art documents, it is not possible to identify combinations of references or explain the motivation for a person having ordinary skill in the art to combine them.