Patent 12211095
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The provided patent text for US12211095B1 does not include a "Prior Art" section listing specific prior art documents (e.g., "References Cited"). While the patent abstract and background describe existing methods for remote check deposit and the challenges associated with them, and "Prior art keywords" are listed in the metadata (check, user, image, camera, video frame), no specific patent or publication references are cited within the provided text that could be combined for an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Therefore, I cannot identify combinations of prior art references that would render the claims obvious or explain the motivation to combine them, as the foundational prior art documents are not supplied in the given information.
To perform such an analysis, a list of relevant prior art patents and/or publications would be required. This list is typically found in the "References Cited" section of a patent document.
Generated 5/29/2026, 5:38:53 PM