Obviousness

I am unable to perform an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103 because the provided patent text for US12143424 does not include a list of specific prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, publications) that were cited during prosecution or are otherwise available for analysis.

The "Prior art keywords" (data, computer system, pipeline, transformation, transformation pipeline) and "Prior art date" (2015-10-28) listed in the "Prior art" section of the patent merely provide general technical context and the earliest priority date for the patent family, respectively. They do not constitute specific prior art documents that can be combined to assess obviousness.

To conduct a proper obviousness analysis, I would need specific prior art documents to identify their teachings and determine whether a person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine them to arrive at the claimed invention.