Patent 12125070
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method) on file for US Patent 12,125,070 as of May 29, 2026. This means the patent's claims have not been challenged before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and remain untested in this forum.
Strategic summary
As of the current date, no claims of US Patent 12,125,070 have been subjected to an AIA trial proceeding. Consequently, all claims of the patent are considered UNTESTED by the PTAB. There is no estoppel landscape to consider under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) because no proceedings have been instituted.
The absence of PTAB activity is a notable signal. Patents that are actively asserted or are considered high-value targets often attract IPRs, especially if they are deemed vulnerable to prior art challenges. The current assignee, Innovation Technologies Partners LP, is a known patent asserter, and while they have initiated litigation involving other patents, this specific patent has not yet faced a PTAB challenge.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US Patent 12,125,070, a potential defendant facing assertion of this patent has a full range of prior-art grounds available for a possible IPR, PGR, or CBM petition (if applicable). The patent was granted on October 22, 2024.
- PGR Window: A Post-Grant Review (PGR) petition for this patent could have been filed within nine months of its issuance (by July 22, 2025). Since that window has closed, a PGR is no longer an option unless the patent is a Covered Business Method patent.
- IPR Window: An Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition can be filed after the PGR window has passed, or any time after nine months from the patent grant, up until the patent's expiration. Therefore, an IPR remains a viable option.
- CBM Eligibility: Given the patent's subject matter relates to content delivery and advertising systems, it may be worth assessing if it could qualify as a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent. CBM review allows for broader grounds of challenge, including 35 U.S.C. § 101 and § 112, and can be filed at any time, but it applies specifically to patents claiming a method or apparatus for performing data processing or other operations used in the management of a financial product or service, provided it's not a "technological invention". The CBM program, however, sunsetted in September 2020, meaning new CBM petitions are no longer being accepted for patents other than those already within an ongoing proceeding.
A comprehensive prior art search and invalidity analysis would be crucial to identify strong grounds for an IPR challenge. The absence of previous PTAB challenges means a defendant would be the first to test the patent's validity in this administrative forum.
Generated 5/29/2026, 9:02:06 PM