Patent 12075116
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Egla Corp
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review) on file for US patent 12075116. This indicates that the patent has not yet been challenged in an AIA trial at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). For a defendant, this means the patent's claims are untested in this forum, and all prior art grounds remain available for potential PTAB challenges.
Strategic summary
As of 2026-05-30, no claims of US patent 12075116 have been canceled, sustained, or otherwise adjudicated in an AIA trial proceeding. All claims of the patent, specifically claims 1-14, remain untested by the PTAB.
The estoppel landscape is entirely open. Since no AIA trials have been initiated or concluded, there are no prior art grounds that would be barred under § 315(e)(2) for a potential petitioner (or their privies). This provides maximum flexibility for a defendant considering a PTAB challenge.
There are no observable patterns of challenges, multiple petitions by the same entity, aggressive appeals by the patent owner, or involvement of defensive aggregators like Unified Patents, given the absence of any PTAB activity.
Recommended next steps
If you are a defendant facing assertion of US patent 12075116, the absence of PTAB activity suggests that a robust prior art search and a well-crafted IPR petition could be a viable defensive strategy. The patent's claims have not been subjected to PTAB scrutiny, meaning no claims have been "hardened" by surviving such challenges. The full range of prior art arguments remains available for an IPR.
Generated 5/30/2026, 6:46:24 AM