Patent 12037567
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
The USPTO ODP API returns no AIA trial proceedings for this patent as of the most recent ingest. Therefore, there are no PTAB proceedings on file for US patent 12,037,567, indicating that the patent's claims remain untested by AIA trials.
Strategic summary
As of today's date, May 29, 2026, all claims of US patent 12,037,567 (claims 1-18) are UNTESTED in AIA trial proceedings. There have been no IPR, PGR, or CBM trials filed against this patent. This means there is currently no estoppel landscape to consider under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) for potential petitioners. The absence of PTAB activity suggests that either the patent has not yet been asserted aggressively enough to provoke a challenge, or potential challengers have not yet identified strong prior art grounds for an AIA trial.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US patent 12,037,567, a defendant facing assertion of this patent would have all prior-art grounds available for a potential IPR or PGR. The absence of PTAB challenges for a patent, especially one with a priority date of 2017-08-23, could suggest that it has not yet been widely asserted in litigation or that the existing prior art landscape (as discussed in the obviousness section) has not been leveraged in an AIA trial. A thorough prior art search would be a critical first step for any defendant considering a challenge.
Generated 5/29/2026, 9:02:58 PM