Obviousness

I cannot perform an obviousness analysis of US Patent 12008509B2 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as requested.

To conduct an obviousness analysis, I would need specific prior art references (e.g., other patent documents, journal articles, product manuals, etc.) to combine and explain the motivation for doing so. The provided patent text for US12008509B2 only lists "Prior art keywords" (product, computer, delivery, food, food product) and a "Prior art date" (2015-03-30). These keywords describe the general field of the invention and what was broadly known, but do not identify specific prior art documents that can be combined in an obviousness argument.

Without identifiable prior art references to serve as a primary reference and secondary references, it is not possible to construct a valid obviousness argument that demonstrates how a person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine specific teachings to arrive at the claimed invention.