Obviousness

To analyze the obviousness of US patent 11929896 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, it is necessary to identify specific prior art references and then assess whether a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) would have been motivated to combine these references to arrive at the claimed invention.

However, the provided patent text, including the "Prior art keywords" ("network", "graph", "entity", "entities", "generic") and the background section, describes the general state of the art and its deficiencies. It does not list specific prior art references (e.g., other patents, publications, or technical disclosures) that could be combined to perform an obviousness analysis as required by 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Without specific prior art documents to examine and combine, I cannot identify combinations of references that would render the claims obvious or explain the motivation for a PHOSITA to combine them. Therefore, I am unable to complete this requested analysis based on the information provided.