Patent 11812895
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Shenzhen Huajing International Trade Co Ltd
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
The USPTO ODP API indicates no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 11,812,895. A web search for recent or older proceedings also did not surface any PTAB activity. Therefore, all claims of the patent are currently untested by PTAB proceedings. This means a defendant has a full range of prior art and statutory bases available for an AIA trial.
Strategic summary
As of the current date, US Patent 11,812,895 has not been subject to any AIA trial proceedings before the PTAB. This means all claims (1-16) of the patent are currently sustained and untested by any IPR, PGR, or CBM challenges. Consequently, there is no estoppel landscape established by previous PTAB decisions, leaving all potential prior-art grounds and statutory bases (§ 102, § 103, § 112) available for a potential petitioner. The absence of PTAB activity could suggest various things, such as the patent being relatively new, not yet widely asserted, or that prior art challenges have not been identified or pursued.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US Patent 11,812,895, the absence of such proceedings means there are no trial-stage milestones or deadlines to note. If facing an assertion of this patent, a defendant would have the full breadth of PTAB trial options available, including Inter Partes Review, to challenge the patentability of the claims based on prior art.
Generated 5/30/2026, 6:45:43 PM