Obviousness

The request asks for an obviousness analysis of US Patent 11809431 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, specifically identifying combinations of prior art references and motivations for combining them.

However, the "Prior Art section of this page" provided in the prompt only lists "Prior art keywords" (data, client, clients, goals, providers) and a "Prior art date" (2013-03-15). It does not provide specific prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, publications, or other documents) that disclose elements of the claims.

Without specific prior art references to analyze and combine, it is not possible to perform a proper obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103. A thorough obviousness analysis requires:

1. Identifying the scope and content of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Determining whether the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention, which often involves considering motivations to combine references, secondary considerations, etc.

Since specific prior art references are not provided, I cannot identify combinations of references that would render the claims obvious, nor can I explain the motivation for combining them. I lack the necessary factual basis from the provided "Prior Art section" to complete this specific aspect of the task.