Patent 11778415
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: X One Inc
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no PTAB proceedings on file for US Patent 11,778,415.
Strategic summary
As of May 30, 2026, there are no PTAB proceedings (Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review) recorded for US Patent 11,778,415. This means all claims of the patent are currently UNTESTED at the PTAB. Consequently, there is no estoppel landscape established through PTAB trials that would bar potential petitioners from raising any prior-art grounds.
The absence of PTAB activity could indicate several things: the patent is relatively new (issued October 3, 2023) and may not have been asserted widely yet, or any assertions thus far have not prompted a defendant to file a PTAB petition. It's also possible that the patent owner's enforcement strategy has not yet led to situations where defendants perceive a PTAB challenge as a viable or necessary defense.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US Patent 11,778,415, a potential defendant facing assertion of this patent would have a full range of prior art grounds available for a potential PTAB challenge (e.g., IPR or PGR, depending on the claims and filing date). This also means there are no prior PTAB decisions to leverage for invalidation arguments or to inform an infringement defense. The absence of PTAB activity does not necessarily mean the patent is strong; rather, it suggests it has not yet been subjected to this specific form of validity challenge.
Generated 5/30/2026, 6:48:19 AM